www.slack.com

Report from 7/17/2026, 1:33:01 PM https://www.slack.com
Latest run · lab, cold cache
49
7/17/2026
28-day score · p75 · the standard
4/7 runs — building history (nightly)

Scored by v3 · source-of-truth hashes: score db860d6ac94e · thresholds e94f8b33e500 — verifiable against the canonical scorer.

The 28-day score is the p75 of nightly runs — the stable number to cite. Deterministic metrics (CRR/SSD/TC) show their latest value (they move only when the site changes); timing (TTFUT) and answer-fidelity (AF) are smoothed by 28-day p75 — the same lab-vs-field split Core Web Vitals uses. Synthetic daily measurement, not real-user field data.

Core Agent Vitals badge  Embed this badge

Show your agent-readiness score anywhere — it links back to this report.

[![Core Agent Vitals](https://agentvitals.dev/badge/slack.com.svg)](https://agentvitals.dev/results?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.slack.com)
<a href="https://agentvitals.dev/results?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.slack.com"><img src="https://agentvitals.dev/badge/slack.com.svg" alt="Core Agent Vitals" height="20"></a>
What AI tells your customers about youAgent confidence: LOW
🟡Business nameSlack · guessed from page text (no structured data)
Categorynot found
Pricenot applicable · not applicable to this page type
Locationnot applicable · not applicable to this page type
Hoursnot applicable · not applicable to this page type
Productsnot applicable · not applicable to this page type
🟡DescriptionBoost productivity and save time with Slack‌ — ‌the AI work platform for managing projects, automating workflows, and connecting teams securely. Start working smarter today. · guessed from page text (no structured data)

An agent is likely to fabricate missing details rather than say “I don’t know”. 0/3 applicable facts come from machine-readable structured data.

49
Overall score
weighted CAV (0–100)
FAIL
0–4950–8990–100

Metrics

100%
CRR Content Recovery Good
0.22
SSD Semantic Signal Density Poor
840 tok
TC Token Cost Good
408 ms
TTFUT Time to First Useful Token N/A

Token Cost breakdown

Where the page's tokens go (≈12,138 across regions). 56% is non-content — chrome and boilerplate an agent pays for. Add landmark roles (main/nav/header/footer) so agents can skip it.

Content
43.9% · 5,327
Chrome (nav / header / footer)
52.4% · 6,355
Boilerplate (cookie / ad)
3.7% · 444
Other
0.1% · 12

Final screenshot

Final screenshot of https://www.slack.com

Diagnostics

high SSD Low signal-to-noise for agents

content vs chrome/boilerplate

Evidencesignal 0.29 +llms.txt bonus · JSON-LD 0/1 · missing: structured-data
ImpactAgent spends tokens parsing nav/boilerplate instead of content.
Effort30–90 min

Fix: Wrap the real content in <main>/<article>, cut repeated nav/boilerplate, and keep the primary content dense and early in the DOM.

medium TC 56.1% of tokens are non-content (boilerplate/chrome)

agent representation — token decomposition

EvidenceToken decomposition: content 43.9%, chrome 52.4%, boilerplate 3.7%, other 0.1%. Only 43.9% of the agent's tokens are real content.
ImpactAn agent pays for boilerplate on every request and has less context left for the real content.
Effort30–90 min

Fix: Strip repeated nav/header/footer/cookie chrome from the agent-visible output; wrap content in <main>/<article> so the extractor keeps signal and drops boilerplate.

Rendered profile: headless

Agent Discoverability 83/100 · Agent Ready

Access & discovery checks — separate from the gated CAV metrics above. Click an issue for business impact, what we measured, and how to fix. · Take the Agent Readiness course →

Agent files & endpoints

llms.txt Found at /llms.txt Learn →
robots.txt (AI bots) Major AI bots allowed Learn →
sitemap.xml Found at /sitemap.xml Learn →
JSON-LD structured data No JSON-LD found Learn →
~ agents.json Absent (emerging standard) Learn →
~ WebMCP endpoint Absent (emerging standard) Learn →
~ OpenAPI / API docs No OpenAPI/Swagger found Learn →

Issues (5)

~ No content-blocking cookie wall medium impact Consent platform: onetrust (verify it doesn't block content)

Business impact A consent wall that hides content until a click is invisible to agents — they cannot click 'Accept'.

What we measured We fingerprint OneTrust, Cookiebot, Usercentrics and similar managers and flag content-blocking ones.

How to fix Use an overlay banner that leaves content in the DOM, not a blocking interstitial.

Spec: https://gdpr.eu/cookies/

Structured data (JSON-LD) medium impact No JSON-LD found

Business impact Schema.org JSON-LD tells agents what a page IS (product, article, business) with typed fields (price, rating, hours). Without it agents extract less reliably.

What we measured We parse <script type=application/ld+json>, validate it, and check for populated @type fields.

How to fix Add JSON-LD: Organization/LocalBusiness on the homepage, Product on product pages, Article on posts.

Learn how to implement →

<script type="application/ld+json">{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Organization","name":"Your Co","url":"https://example.com"}</script>

Spec: https://schema.org/

~ agents.json discovery low impact Absent (emerging standard)

Business impact agents.json describes what your site can DO for agents (services, endpoints, capabilities) — an emerging discovery standard. Early adopters get native agent integration.

What we measured We check /agents.json and /.well-known/agents.json for a valid configuration.

How to fix Publish /agents.json describing your site's capabilities and actions.

Learn how to implement →

Spec: https://github.com/wild-card-ai/agents-json

~ WebMCP endpoint low impact Absent (emerging standard)

Business impact WebMCP lets agents call actions on your site directly (book, buy, query) instead of scraping the DOM. Early adopters get native AI-agent interoperability.

What we measured We check /.well-known/webmcp and /webmcp.json for a valid actions array.

How to fix Add a WebMCP endpoint exposing your key actions to agents.

Learn how to implement →

Spec: https://webmcp.org

~ API documentation low impact No OpenAPI/Swagger found

Business impact Programmatic agents prefer a typed API. An OpenAPI/Swagger spec lets them integrate without scraping.

What we measured We probe /openapi.json, /swagger.json, /api-docs and /.well-known/openapi.json.

How to fix Publish an OpenAPI spec at a well-known path.

Learn how to implement →

Spec: https://www.openapis.org/

Passed audits (6)

✓ robots.txt allows AI bots✓ No CAPTCHA wall✓ llms.txt present + valid✓ No login wall on public content✓ XML sitemap present + fresh✓ Server response (TTFB)

Transport & Trust (SEC 1.0.0)

HTTPS, HSTS, CSP, sniffing, referrer and CORS posture. Diagnostic only — this does not affect the CAV score. A security header does not make a page more legible to an agent, so scoring it would reward a CDN toggle that changes nothing an agent can recover. We measure it and say so.

67Transport posture (0–100, unscored)
3pass
0warn
2fail
Per-header findings (6)
HeaderEvidence
✅ HTTPSserved over HTTPS
✅ HSTSmax-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
❌ Content-Security-Policyno content-security-policy header
❌ X-Content-Type-Optionsmissing nosniff
✅ Referrer-Policyno-referrer
➖ CORS exposureno CORS headers on the document (normal for an HTML page)
Full profile — how to improve · unused JS · network · timing

A deeper scan (a second render, ~30–60s): network waterfall, unused JavaScript, long tasks, and prioritized fixes. Runs only when you ask; the result is cached so it never re-runs.

Analyzing…
running mobile + desktop · ~30s